Even the mission itself has no heroic or patriotic aim; there is no hill to be taken, no redoubt to be stormed. Its goal, according to Captain Miller, is public relations. Why then does the film begin and end with Spielberg's flag-waving and a tearful old grandfather mourning at the graves of fallen comrades? Are they merely hedges against the insidious argument of the film that even our last "good" war was as meaningless in its brutality and empty in its heroism as the conflict in Vietnam?
Though Saving Private Ryan amply documents the extraordinary courage of men under fire and suggests the tide of grief their families endured, it never addresses the point of their heroism. How can it honor the horrendous sacrifices our parents and grandparents made when the film seems to demonstrate that neither glory, morality, patriotism, nor any clear meaning attended the slaughter of millions?
Spielberg, aware of this contradiction, told a gathering of entertainment writers in Los Angeles that the movie is really about how two opposing things can both be true. The mission can't be justified on moral or patriotic grounds, and yet the toughest soldier in the squad, Sergeant Horvath, says saving Private Ryan might be the one decent thing they "were able to pull out of this whole godawful, shitty mess.
This is not the only contradiction in the director's historical works. If one considers Spielberg's efforts in the s to turn from the hugely successful entertainments that made his reputation to cinematic examinations of the most profound moral issues of the modern age, apparently inexplicable decisions on the part of the filmmaker seem to contradict the very arguments of those films, too. How can one explain Spielberg's choice, in his film on the Holocaust, to make its hero a German profiteer and, in his film on slavery, to make its hero a white leader of a slave economy?
Of course, a Jewish clerk in Schindler's List prods his German employer to outwit the Final Solution and an enslaved African in Amistad goads a white former president of the United States to outmaneuver the very legal system dedicated, as it was, to the preservation of slavery that his oath of office had sworn him to uphold and defend.
But the director leaves no doubt as to which character is the central focus of the narrative conflict: Since monstrous systems of exploitation constrain both Jew and African from independent action, only the beneficiaries of those inhumane systems are capable of change and, thus, able to serve as the protagonists of these dramas.
Though we may assume these two films are about suffering—and presented with the vivid depiction of cruelty a camera can offer, an audience may find it difficult to look beyond such graphic images of misery to another, subtler subject— Schindler's List and Amistad are, in fact, about guilt and responsibility.
They are not, as many imagine, noble memorials to the millions of victims of the Holocaust and slavery; rather, they are agonized meditations on all of those somehow implicated in those vast human tragedies. A similar, though much more complex, contradiction beats at the very heart of Saving Private Ryan and accounts for the dissonance noted by virtually every critic between the body of the film and its opening and closing. How can the sentimental tableau of a weeping old man, his wife, his son, his daughter-in-law, and his grandchildren possibly serve as a fit conclusion to so savage and unsentimental a film?
Spielberg himself offered a clue when, continuing his conversation with those entertainment writers in Los Angeles, he described his father's own war stories: "I was supposed to wave the flag and be patriotic and say that without his efforts I wouldn't have the freedoms I had or even the freedom to have the bicycle I was riding.
Private Ryan, a dazed kid surrounded by the bodies of men who were absurdly ordered to their deaths to save him, is given the equally absurd command by the dying hero, Captain Miller, to "earn this" and must now bear the terrible, impossible order until his own death. But don't we all struggle under Ryan's moral burden?
And how can Ryan, or for that matter any of us, ever pay such a debt—and to whom? Spielberg had already once suggested the answer to that profound question. In the epilogue to Schindler's List , contemporary descendants of the Jews saved by Oskar Schindler process past his grave.
Again at the end of Saving Private Ryan , as a grandfather and his son and grandchildren pay homage to those whose deaths we have just witnessed, the living are called not merely to bear witness to the achievement of fallen heroes; the living are, in fact, the achievement itself. Like Private Ryan, we cannot help but ask what we've done to deserve such sacrifice by others and beg their forgiveness for what we have cost them.
And like James Ryan, all we can do to justify that sacrifice is to live our lives as well as we are able. This is not to suggest Spielberg has made a perfect film. There is a difference between virtuosity and genius, between a tour de force and a masterpiece. Saving Private Ryan is flawed, in part because it loses its nerve. Those surviving veterans who actually leapt into the reddened surf of Omaha Beach have attested to the accuracy of the film's depiction of modern war and, particularly, of the Normandy Invasion; for that artistic accomplishment, the director deserves all the accolades heaped upon him.
On the other hand, the flag-waving patriotism it pretends at in its first and last shots is as transparent as the faded flag Spielberg waves across the screen. And landing on that concept really changed everything.
The Omaha Beach sequence was naturally the most challenging scene in the film. Baby boomer audiences had previously seen the version of the battle in Darryl F. Before shooting began, the director spoke with author Stephen E. Ambrose, considered one of the top World War II historians in the country. But he described how everything was not in focus for him. And he described the sounds, and he described the vibrations of every concussion of every 88 shell that hit the beach, which gave some of them bloody noses, rattled their ears.
The ground would come up and slam into their faces from the concussions. Burns relates a story that occurred on the last day of shooting. All Sections. About Us. B2B Publishing.
Sometimes, he has been able to combine the two into one movie. In addition to being a big book for colons, it also helped inspire Rodat along with a monument he saw to lives lost in various wars.
Rodat pitched his idea to producer Mark Gordon, who pitched the idea to Paramount. There was no script at the time, but Paramount liked the idea and commissioned a script from Rodat. Once the script was finished, both Spielberg and his agent read the script and both liked it. Clearly, Spielberg had an interest in the subject.
When casting his film, Spielberg said he wanted to cast actors who would look the part. These days, Spielberg and Hanks are tied together. Hanks was already a big star, but the rest of the cast was relatively star-free at the time. That being said, you will definitely recognize some faces. Jon M. Chu Jon M. All Rights reserved. Close the menu Logo text.
0コメント